1 /5 Grace: I am writing to formally complain about the completely unacceptable experience I had at Withdean Sports Complex this evening.
Yesterday, I specifically phoned ahead to check whether the track would be open and available for use this evening. I explained clearly that I intended to come down to train, and I was explicitly assured that the track had no events on and therefore would be open and that I would be able to use it without issue.
Based on that assurance, I attended this evening, paid to use the track and began my warm-up. During that warm-up, I was interrupted on three separate occasions and repeatedly told to leave the track. The reason given was not that the track was booked or in use for an event, but simply that there was no event on that evening and therefore your team did not want to turn the floodlights on.
This is despite the fact that the floodlights had been turned on just five minutes earlier and were then switched back off again.
I find this completely unreasonable. I paid £6.15 at the front desk on arrival to use the track. At no point was I informed - either during my phone call yesterday or at the point of payment - that track use was conditional on there being an event, or that lighting would be withheld at management’s discretion.
To make matters worse, the manager’s solution was to suggest I use the gym instead - I did not come here to use the gym when I could have used a gym for free at home. I paid specifically for track access, which I was denied after being assured it would be available.
I was also repeatedly told that it was a “health and safety hazard” for me to run in the dark. Yet, despite this supposed concern, once I made it very clear to your team member that I would not be leaving (given Id paid to use the track and already been assured that it was open for use), I was allowed to continue running in the dark for over an hour. This contradiction seriously undermines the health and safety argument that was being used to justify removing me from the track in the first place.
In summary:
I was assured in advance that the track would be available;
I paid to use the track;
I was repeatedly interrupted and told to leave purely because your team did not want to switch the floodlights on, citing "health and safety" concerns;
The decision to leave the floodlights off presumably to save costs, despite my continued use of the track, demonstrates a blatant disregard for health and safety and exposes a troubling inconsistency in how risk is assessed and managed on site;
I was offered a gym as a substitute for a service I did not pay for; and
Health and safety was cited inconsistently and unconvincingly (if your team were so concerned about health and safety, they surely should have just kept the lights on)
This experience was frustrating, disruptive, and entirely avoidable. I expect a clear explanation of why paying customers are permitted to use the track only at your discretion, why staff are providing misleading information, and what steps will be taken to ensure this does not happen again.